phpbb .

talkclacton.myfastforum.org

myfs_talkclacton1 management

A discussion group on local issues for residents of Tendring District

Dredging our beaches?
Page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    talkclacton.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Environmental
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertsing.






Posted:     Post subject:

Back to top
amenity2



Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Posts: 798


Location: Dovercourt

PostPosted: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Got this today, if erosion is of interest to you this might be it?

REVIEW OF UK MARINE AGGREGATE EXTRACTION ACTIVITIES from The Crown Estate and BMAPA showing historic
patterns of marine aggregate extraction in metric tonnes for 2000 - 2005, excluding beach replenishment and fill contracts.

EXTRACTION AREA   2000             2001             2002             2003              2004             2005            Total

HUMBER                  3,122,080      2,933,623     2,710,881       2,928,366      3,031,699      3,392,015    18,118,664
EAST COAST            9,129,635     9,636,697     9,011,323       8,611,199      8,538,073      7,881,670    52,808,597
THAMES                     854,483        909,141      1,291,103         838,185         758,257         696,012     5,347,181
SOUTH COAST         5,613,538     5,628,008      5,399,080      5,658,262      5,148,959       5,389,346   32,837,193
S. WEST COAST      1,602,394     1,549,431      1,467,122      1,515,241      1,633,383       1,591,610     9,359,181
N. WEST COAST        316,090        421,068         482,270         470,962         558,398         611,983     2,860,771
RIVERS & MISC           46,120          73,047           78,597          85,153           99,079         124,506        506,502
------------------------      ---------------    ---------------   ----------------     ----------------       ---------------     ---------------    -----------------
YEARLY TOTAL     20,684,340   21,151,015   20,440,376     20,107,368      19,767,848    19,687,142   121,838,089

According to moisture content and stone to sand ratio, there's usually between 1.6 and 1.9 metric tonnes weight for
each cubic metre of aggregate. That related to uses a dry weight ratio of 1.72:1. Therefore, the six year total take of
121,838,089  tonnes would mean a removal of  70,836,052 cubic metres.The level given is undoubtedly that landed to
destination. In practice over twice this would have been extracted as some half is rejected by washing off back to the
sea so as to hold the prime coarse cohesive sand and gravel to be used for the best grade concrete.

Such a quantity is difficult to visualise, but can be estimated by theoretically placing it on top of a town or city of a
known area. (Don't try this in practice unless you can chose Westminster) and calculating how high it would reach,
or how many times it would fill the Albert Hall. If any of you feel like showing this graphically or pictorially and letting
me have a copy for our website it would be appreciated as it would help visualise the situation we now have.

It is interesting to note that the findings of erosion of each area correlate quite powerfully with the levels taken, as does
the lowering of the seabed when related to the cumulative active dredging areas.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    talkclacton.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Environmental All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
top Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive top
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group myfs_talkclacton1 management
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum



Visit theTalkClacton website